Luck?

Robert McNamara claimed it was luck that kept us out of war with the Soviet Union during the Cuban Missile Crisis. Do you agree or disagree with this? Provide 2 facts or details to support your argument.

Soviets Back Down?

According to Castro there were 162 missiles assembled in Cuba and he was ready to use them against the US. Why did The Soviet Union finally back down and remove the missiles?

Winning the Crisis?

Did either side really win the Cuban Missile Crisis? The United States agreed to take out missiles in Turkey, the Soviets took them out of Cuba. How did the crisis impact further relations with the Soviet Union?

Should We Have Dropped the Bomb--Militarily?

Many argue that the atomic bomb was used as an escalation of the bombs used in the previous attacks. Using a weapon for its use as a military objective would therefore, be justified. Knowing what you know about what the bomb did, how it affected people, and the other options available, should the bomb have been used as a military weapon? Why/Why Not?

Be respectful of others' posts, remember your four letter code.

Should We Have Dropped the Bomb--Politically?

Many contend the atomic bombs were dropped to scare the Soviets. This view holds that the bomb was used to discourage the Soviet Union from expanding in Asia as well as in Europe. Communism is a form of government where the government controls all means of production and private property is very limited. Ninety percent of U.S. law is about private property, thus, Communism is a threat to the American way of life.

Should the United States have used the weapon to threaten another nation that was an ally? Was it justified in using it as a symbol of force and power? Why or Why not?

Be respectful of others' posts, remember your four letter code.

Should We Have Dropped the Bomb--Morally?

Morality: normatively to refer to a code of conduct that, given specified conditions, would be put forward by all rational persons.

Morality is a basic set of principles of right and wrong.

Was Truman morally right to drop the bomb? Is it okay for any nation to wipe out a city--populated mainly by civilians and not military personnel--as a means to end a war? Why? Why not?

Also, no one has responded to Document 4, which is closely associated with this question. Perhaps reviewing it may help in your response.

Be respectful of others' posts, remember your four letter code.

Document 1

"I had then set up a committee of top men and had asked them to study with great care the implications the new weapons might have for us. It was their recommendation that the bomb be used against the enemy as soon as it could be done. They recommended further that it should be used without specific warning. I had realized, of course, that an atomic bomb explosion would inflict damage and casualties beyond imagination. On the other hand, the scientific advisors of the committee reported that no technical demonstration they might propose, such as over a deserted island, would be likely to bring the war to an end. It had to be used against an enemy target.The final decision of where and when to use the atomic bomb was up to me. Let there be no mistake about it. I regarded the bomb as a military weapon and never doubted it should be used."
President Harry S. Truman

Why did President Truman feel that the atomic bomb had to be used against enemy targets?

Was the atomic bomb strictly for military use?

Document 2

"The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender...
"In being the first to use it, we . . . adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages. I was not taught to make war in that fashion, and wars cannot be won by destroying women and children."Admiral William E. Leahy, President Truman's Chief of Staff, in his memoirs "I Was There"

Why did Admiral Leahy feel the use of the atomic bomb on Japan was unnecessary?

Why did Admiral Leahy think the use of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was ethically wrong?

What branch of service was Leahy and why would that affect his opinion?

Document 3

Document 3
"The face of war is the face of death; death is an inevitable part of every order that a wartime leader gives. The decision to use the atomic bomb was a decision that brought death to over a hundred thousand Japanese.
"But this deliberate, premeditated destruction was our least abhorrent alternative. The destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki put an end to the Japanese war. It stopped the fire raids, and the strangling blockade; it ended the ghastly specter of a clash of great land armies. In this last great action of the Second World War we were given final proof that war is death."
Secretary of War Henry Stimson

Why did Stimson think the use of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a terrible thing to do but better than any alternative?

Document 4

Document 4
"How can a human being with any claim to a sense of moral responsibility deliberately let loose an instrument of destruction which can at one stroke annihilate an appalling segment of mankind? This is not war: this is not even murder; this is pure nihilism. This is a crime against God and humanity which strikes at the very basis of moral existence. What meaning is there in any international law, in any rule of human conduct, in any concept of right and wrong, if the very foundations of morality are to be overthrown as the use of this instrument of total destruction threatens to do?"
Nippon Times (Tokyo), August 10, 1945

What does the author mean by saying that dropping a nuclear bomb "strikes at the very basis of moral existence?"

Document 5

Document 5
"The day was August 6, 1945. I was a G.I. who had weathered the war in Europe and now awaited my place in the storming of Japan's home islands. On Truman's orders, the first atomic bomb ever wielded in war exploded over Hiroshima. For Americans in uniform and those who waited for them to come home, outrageous as this might appear from the moral heights of hindsight, it was a sunburst of deliverance."Lester Bernstein, New York Times, 10/24/65

Why did Bernstein feel "a sunburst of deliverance" when the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima?

Document 6

"The view where a moment before all had been so bright and sunny was now dark and hazy What had happened? All over the right side of my body I was bleeding My private nurse set about examining my wounds without speaking a word. No one spoke Why was everyone so quiet? The heat finally became too intense to endure Those who could fled; those who could not perished
Hiroshima was no longer a city but a burned-over prairie. To the east and to the west everything was flattened. The distant mountains seemed nearer than I could ever remember How small Hiroshima was with its houses gone."
- Michihiko Hachiya, Hiroshima Diary: The Journal of a Japanese Physician August 6 - September 30, 1945

What observations did the doctor make about the effects of the bombing on his city?

Document 7

Images of Nagasaki, 1945 Source: Yamahata photographs © Shogo Yamahata, The Day After the Nagasaki Bombing. The Japan Peace Museum (www.peace-museum.org)

Describe the effects of the bombing, as seen in these photographs.